Earlier this morning, Apple announced another media event for this coming Wednesday (October 20th, 2010). The invitation is traditionally nebulous: the Apple logo slightly turned revealing, what appears to be, a lion behind it. Written below, “Back to the Mac.”
A few months ago Steve Jobs made news when a consumer emailed, his famous email address, to ask why Apple had seemingly abandoned the Mac OS, spending all of their time on iOS: this year’s developer’s conference was dedicated 100% to iOS (iOS powers iPhones, iPod Touches and the iPad). Steve responded, telling the concerned user “…not to worry.”
Apparently, Steve wasn’t lying: The invitation (pictured above) clearly reminds us all that Apple is dedicated to the Mac platform and isn’t abandoning it anytime soon.
In a recent Apple patent filing, the company applied to trademark a Mac that could stand upright (like a traditional iMac), but also kneel down, possibly transitioning to iOS and better suiting itself to touch interaction.
Microsoft has supported touch with their OS for some time now and they even advertise it with many of their licensed desktops and “tablet” PCs; the problem is that Microsoft has never modified their OS to truly adapt to touch. Instead, they’ve simply supported hardware that will allow you to touch your screen. Trying to touch something small is still one hell of a task. After all, there is a reason most of these devices ship with a pen-like stylus —- our fingers are just too big.
Apple, on the other hand, has recognized that touching an operating system designed for a mouse is not only unpleasant, it’s unacceptable. Their iOS was built specifically for touch. The question at large is, “will Mac OS X somehow integrate with iOS?“ Could a hybrid Mac be on the horizon?
While we won’t know what Apple has up their sleeves until the 20th, that won’t stop us from hoping speculating: One can reasonably assume that we’ll see a preview of what OS X.7 will look like, perhaps even a release timeline (i, personally, doubt we’ll see it released during this time). But, here’s hoping to something MUCH more exciting…
Are you following MaximizeUrMac on Twitter?
It’s back-to-school time for many young adults and with that comes the inevitable: a new computer. Many folks are purchasing for the first time, and even more are considering the switch from Windows to Mac. Windows has typically had a much larger following of established users, but that’s changing. It started with the original iPod and has only snowballed since. It’s called the “halo effect:” “a cognitive bias whereby the perception of one trait is influenced by the perception of another (or several traits) of that person or object.”
In Apple’s case, the iPod & iPhone have shown loyal windows users that they [Apple] not only make impeccable hardware, but that they create beautiful, functional, simple and powerful software that outperforms even the best competitors —- including Microsoft.
As more and more people are using iPods and iPhones they are left thinking: “If this device is this good, this simple to use, i wonder what their computers might be like.” That’s when they consider switching.

For a long time, Apple had to put out a message that when comparing Apple to Windows, Apple was far superior…you remember the commercials, right? “I’m a Mac, and I’m a PC.” Well, Apple has since stopped those commercials, but it looks like Microsoft has been forced to start. Nothing on television yet, but they did make recent news with this terribly designed page (right): an attempt to dismay potential switchers. Apple still maintains their page (also right), showing how easy it is to switch and how easy it is to use a mac.
In a smart article, Mac | Life has taken on each of Microsofts claims and I have been complelled to not only reprint there content here, but add my comments as well. Their original article can be found here.
Mac | Life in purple:
1. Microsoft says: Manage windows more easily with Windows 7
Hold on, what? Apple invented Windows when they created the Finder back in 1984, and things have only gone uphill for Mac OS users. Windows 7 touts the fun new feature of “snapping” windows together–arranging windows side by side neatly snaps them in place, and dragging borders instantly maximizes–but this is kids stuff compared to Expose and stacks–all features Windows 7 copied directly from OS X!
Managing windows within Windows has always been a chore. With Windows 7, Microsoft has finally introduced a few management techniques for their users, including those described above. But, i still think that they are missing the mark. Rather than incorporating features that are usable (as Apple has), they are throwing in whiz-bang gimmicks that they claim will improve usability. I disagree. Take the new “Shake” feature for example: Microsoft says “Need to cut through a cluttered desktop and quickly focus on a single window? Now with Windows 7, you can just click, hold down, and give your mouse a shake. Voila! Every open window except that one instantly disappears. Jiggle again—and your windows are back.”
huh? how is that usable? or productive? disrupting the existing window to isolate others? and what if aren’t using a mouse? On a trackpad, you’d need to click the titlebar with one finger and use the other to “swipe back and forth, quickly” on the track pad itself. Silly.
Even if Apple had NO other window management features, Expose alone outshines everything, even the whiz-bang, on Windows. Getting in the habit of using Expose amplifies productivity like few other tools —- whether you are using Photoshop, Word, iMovie OR the Finder [desktop windows].
2. Microsoft says: Macs can take time to learn
We’re not really sure where this point comes from, unless you’re a hardcore Windows user switching over to a Mac–then certainly, a Mac will be less familiar than Windows. We can only assume Microsoft is targeting the most casual user, who hasn’t chosen sides yet. And with programs that sync your entire life out of the box, and a file structure with clear labels, you can’t get simpler than a Mac. Microsoft, tell us, have you started hiding the C:/ drive yet?
My argument doesn’t steam much from ML’s above. The statement is not only generic, but misleading. Switching anything in life will require some getting use to, but that doesn’t mean it’s a bad thing. Imagine going from an automatic car, to a manual transmission…
Apple has the advantage in that at least their applications and operating system are notoriously intuitive —- hello drag & drop!
3. Microsoft says: Networking is easier.

Microsoft points out that you can access wireless networks in “as few as three clicks.” We’ll stop them right there. In OS X, it takes one! As we know, OS X conveniently displays a drop down of accessible networks in the status bar. Also, OS X automatically sees Windows PCs. Unfortunately, we can’t say the same about Windows 7.
Having spent many years networking college campus’ and offices (with both Macs & Windows PCs), i can attest that there is no easier platform to network with than a Mac. Not only do they automatically discover one another, they easily find and link with Windows computers.
4. Microsoft says: Manage devices more easily.
In this day and age, most of our external devices are iPods and iPhones. iTunes manages these devices and is much more stable on the Mac. What about printers, you say? Mac has been doing plug and play for ages.
ML makes a good point here, but i’d like to go a little further with Apple’s help:
“Almost any device that connects to a computer via USB, audio cable, or Bluetooth will work with a Mac. That includes digital cameras, external hard drives, printers, keyboards, speakers, and more.
You can even use a right-click mouse with a Mac. And with thousands of device drivers included with Mac OS X, you can start using these devices as soon as you plug them in — no need to manually download additional software.”
It’s also worth pointing out that all new Macs come with iPhoto: Apple’s award winning, free, photo management application. Plug your digital camera into your Mac and iPhoto magically knows to open it. It guides you through downloading pictures, retouching them, organizing them and sharing them. Windows users have no viable counterpart & are often left to install the manufacturer’s sub-par applications JUST to download and manage their photos. That may not have been such a big deal when digital cameras were first emerging in our lives, but just think about how many photos you have, digitally, now. Furthermore, Apple rethought the nature of the personal computer back in 2001, calling it our “Digital Hub.” They were the first computer company to identify that it is no longer the primary device in our lives, but instead, a device that brings all our other devices and information together.
5. Microsoft says: More options and color choices.
If by color choices they mean black and beige, we’ll take white and silver any day. It’s no secret that people like Macs because they look good. And you pay for the PCs that do–just Google the price of a nice Sony Vaio. Microsoft also seems to forget that you can build a Mac to spec–and damn, does it look good!
I differ from ML’s opinion a little here because there are many more color/shape options for Windows users, but not without a compromise. While you can get a pink laptop, or a translucent tower, you are often forced to get them from one of the thousands of computer builders that Microsoft licenses to. Anyone could be building your computer in their basement and selling it. Is that a compromise you are willing to make? just for a colored computer? What happens when the computer or hardware fails? Will that company be able to provide the service necessary to repair or replace it?
Still, ML is right; people have long been drawn to the beauty and simplicity of the Mac and they way that they look. If you insist on having more color options for your Mac, there are plenty of 3rd party options to help.
6. Microsoft says: Compatibility.
Maybe 20 years ago, but these days all files are cross compatible between Macs and PCs, including Microsoft’s own proprietary formats, like .docx, and plug-ins like Silverlight. You have to buy Word for a PC just the same as you do for a Mac!
I’m actually surprised that Microsoft has been foolish enough to try and use the idea of cross-compatibility as a selling point for Windows. Not only does the Mac have versions of Microsoft’s Office Suite, but they have a host of alternatives. Google docs are free and read and write office documents with ease. As we’ve forged further ahead in technology (and as the web has continued to redefine accessibility), formats are no longer just proprietary. Many of them are becoming standardized. Think about it: .mp3, .mpeg, .rtf, .pdf, .jpg, .png, .zip, .txt, etc.
Even more impressive is the Macs ability to actually RUN WINDOWS. That’s right, you can actually buy a copy of windows and run it on your Mac if you want. Everything you need is built right in. For those that only require a few “windows-only” applications (perhasp Microsoft Access), there are many elegant solutions (like Parallels) available for running windows on your Mac with ease.
If you have a PC, it is impossible to run Mac-only software. Want iPhoto? iMovie? iDVD? You’re out of luck.
7. Microsoft says: Easily create movies.
We’re not sure what they mean by easy, but nothing is more direct than making a movie with iMovie, which is free with every new Mac and integrates beautifully with the entire iLife suite. On a PC, we could stick with something like Adobe Premiere, but we have to pay for it!
I couldn’t have said it better myself. The fact that Microsoft even believes they have a leg to stand on (in this particular area) is laughable. A family friend recently made the mistake of trying to create a video for her daughter’s 4th birthday using her “top-of-the-line” Windows PC. After weeks of frustration, she finally gave up and bought a Mac. Her video was done & on DVD in less than 24hrs. She told me, “it was easy, I had fun doing it, and I’m surprised at how professional it looks…for a novice.” Nuff said.
8. Microsoft says: Quickly find what you’re looking for.
Spotlight has been doing this for ages now. Microsoft, you seem to love taking OS X features and saying they’re a reason to use a PC! We’ll give you props for implementing them at least, even if you’re a little late to the game.
Not only is MSFT late in the game, their implementation is not nearly as sophisticated as Apple’s. Spotlight has become a revolution and continues to change the way people use their computers and find their information. In it’s simplest form, it finds documents, pictures, contacts, and visted websites instantly. Go a little further and you’ll be using it to launch applications, scanning networks, etc. Having Spotlight built-into Apple’s Mail application is a dream. Finding an email from three years ago is as easy as typing a word that would have been in it. Microsoft’s Outlook has nothing that even compares. Searching still requires hunting, pecking & re-reading.
9. Microsoft says: Get quicker access to all of your stuff
Windows 7 has jump lists. Mac OS X has stacks. We’ve been dragging stuff to our dock to access it on the fly for ages, and it works great. Windows 7′s new taskbar just emulates our dock a little more. Did we mention we can drag and drop stuff there?
There isn’t much more to say here, except that Microsoft was forced to copy Apple’s dock & stacks after it quickly surpassed the usability of the Windows taskbar. While copied, it’s still not the same.
10. Microsoft says: Share files among multiple PCs
Hey now Microsoft, we have networks, too. And, even better, we have things like iTunes home sharing. It let’s us not only listen to music from other computers over the network, but allows us to consolidate our music libraries too, out of the box. Can you do that?
First, see number 3 above.
After re-reading all that, consider that Apple has long been the leader in sharing your data & media among multiple Macs. In addition to music sharing (as described by ML, above), we have photo sharing. Need to get a file from one computer to the next, just drag and drop. Want to mount a hard drive (connected to another Mac) to the one you are using (wirelessly) on the couch? It’s a click or two.
Apple has even one-uped Microsoft by building VNC directly into the Finder. You can log into ANY Mac of yours, ANYWHERE in the world, easily. Not sure how to set it up? You can follow a tutorial, or just sign your Mac into MobileMe & it will all happen automatically. Windows has nothing even close.
As you can see, there are many, many arguments here and even more that I could make to nearly every point Microsoft might argue, but I think i’ve said enough. The race is no longer as tight as it was, years ago, because Apple has done a superb job of innovating and refining their operating system and computers.

If your considering a new computer, consider a new Mac. If you are a student & are still unsure, consider this: more college students (new and graduating) are buying Macs than any other computer.
Oh, and Apple’s currently offering a free iPod Touch and printer to all students buying a new mac.
Steve Jobs image courtesy of Six Revisions.
Student Statistic chart courtesy of MacRumors.
Are you following MUM on Twitter?
Looks like our friends over at Apple have been working overtime lately…and, not just on diffusing the “antenna-gate” issue surrounding the iPhone 4!
This morning Apple released a flurry of upgrades to their product matrix: new iMacs, a new MacPro tower and a new 27″ Cinema Display. They also debuted two new peripherals: The Apple Magic Trackpad and the Apple Battery Charger.
For the average consumer, I believe that the iMac revision is among the most significant announcements Apple made today. While the “coming soon” MacPro and 27″ display are breathtaking and exceptional options in the Pro market, I believe the iMac upgrade is the one that will benefit most new buyers, now.
It’s “back to school time,” after all. And, while the general exterior of the iMac remains mostly the same, the interior has been beefed up with all sorts of nice features: stronger graphics performance, better built-in displays, more storage/RAM and most notably, much more powerful processors. iMacs now come with either the i3, i5 or i7 QUAD-core Intel chips. Those chips are BEASTS, particularly when running Snow Leopard (10.6, Apple’s latest operating system). Finally, the prices remain the same (starting at just $1,199 US) and the new iMacs qualify for the FREE iPod Touch event Apple is holding for educational users/purchases.
In addition to the product upgrades, Apple also debuted the Magic Trackpad and the Apple Battery Charger. For some power-users, the Magic Trackpad may not come as a huge surprise because it has been circulating via rumors in the blogosphere for several weeks (after it’s FCC approval was granted, and discovered, online). Still, this is the first time Apple has made mention or acknowledged it. The Battery Charger is a bit of a surprise, but a welcome one at that. Both devices are available for sale today. 
Apple truly pioneered the “touch revolution” when they debuted the iPhone. Since then, they have worked incredibly hard to patent new and innovate uses for their touch-technologies (multi-touch, etc.) and have integrated the technologies into many of their products: the iPhone, iPod Touch, iPad, all MacBooks, the Magic Mouse and now the Magic Trackpad.
It seems that Apple has positioned the Magic Trackpad as a replacement for desktop mice (interesting, no?). Many of you recall that Apple popularized the mouse when it launched the Macintosh (1984), but is notorious for abandoning technology [it finds obsolete] long before the rest of the industry. Think about the floppy disk drive (with the original iMac), Networking/Ethernet cords (with the original WiFi iBook) and the CD-ROM drive (with the MacBook Air/iPad). I’m particularly intrigued by the Magic Trackpad. To start, I used a small, wired trackpad with my desktop PowerMac [in place of a mouse] WAYYY back in the mid-90′s. It took some getting use to, but was perfectly capable. The trackpad I had been using was also about half the size of the trackpads found on modern MacBooks, and still I found it pleasant and functional.
The Magic Trackpad is interesting because it’s the largest of its kind, it’s wireless and it supports Apple’s patented multi-touch technology and gestures. Now you can pinch and zoom, swipe left/right/up/down double-tap, triple-tap, etc. And, you can do it all without moving your hand all over the place. Could this be an ergonomic breakthrough for desktop computing?
Apple is offering the Magic Trackpad for $69 US, and is available with any new Mac (in place of an Apple, wired, Mouse or Apple’s touch capable Magic Mouse). Earlier this year I attempted to replace my Microsoft IntelliMouse Optical for Apple’s Magic Mouse, but didn’t last more than 24hrs. I did like that the button-less design and the scrolling/swiping features, but found the mouse too uncomfortable to use long-term. Additionally, i really missed all the “extra” programmable buttons that my IntelliMouse has. I attempted to install the MagicPref utility to add some functionality to what i was missing, but found that the mouse just wasn’t big enough to really identify the unique touch queues it was given. I returned the magic mouse and went back to my MS IntelliMouse. Now that the Magic Trackpad has surfaced, I’m interested in giving it a shot as a replacement to my desktop mouse.
That being said, I think that Apple has missed the boat on price. Many of their accessories (particularly wireless) are hitting the $69 US mark these days. In this economy, that seems unnecessarily high. While it is a large wireless device, I think more people would be trying it out if the price were closer to $40 US. I know I would.
Lastly, Apple has introduced the Apple Battery Charger. This new gadget is a welcome surprise to their accessory line-up. 
We’re all aware that Apple spends a lot of time ensuring that their products are highly recyclable and eco-friendly. Unfortunately, modernism doesn’t come without batteries. Wanna cut cords on your desk? You go wireless, and wireless = batteries. Now, Apple has three peripherals that require batteries and they, even when properly disposed, are increasingly environmentally UN-friendly and toxic. Apple needed to step in and offer their consumers a smarter way to use and maintain their wireless peripherals and this charger should help remind consumers to be mindful when taking advantage of the latest and greatest wireless options.
In true “Apple-form,” the engineers didn’t just replicate the hundreds of “rechargeable batteries and chargers” on the market. They developed one that thinks beyond the norm. Apple’s recharger ships with six batteries (most ship with four). Why six? Apple dreams of the day when it’s customers are using two AA-batteries in their wireless keyboard and two in either their Magic Mouse OR new Magic Trackpad. The remaining two will stay in the charger until another pair runs out so you should never be without a fully charged pair. Smart.
Apple has also revised the way the charger works, aiming to develop something even more eco-friendly. Here’s how they describe the difference between common rechargers and their own:
“When the Apple Battery Charger recharges your batteries, it not only maximizes battery performance and lifespan, it also conserves energy. Thanks to an intelligent power management system, the Apple Battery Charger uses less power once your batteries are fully charged, making it one of the most energy-efficient rechargeable battery solutions ever. The Apple Battery Charger can recharge one or two batteries at a time. It’s optimized for Apple-supplied batteries and it works with AA NiMH batteries from other companies, too.”
Are you following MUM on Twitter?
As if we needed another reason to validate our choice in computers…
Mashable & TUAW have both reported that Google (worldwide) has officially abandoned Windows within their workplaces.
Considering Google contributes 10′s of billions of dollars to the economy each year, this kind of snub shouldn’t go unnoticed.
Google has a powerful voice, and making a statment like this public will certainly have an impact.
As a few articles indicated, Google is planning to release it’s own Operating System (Chrome), later this year, however, this doesn’t feel like a strategic move to promote their unreleased OS. It sounds like they’ve just wised up, too.
Are you following MUM on Twitter?
Well, well, well. There is an awful lot of “snubbing” happening today. First it was Skype snubbing Microsoft’s Windows, now it’s Hulu snubbing Apple’s iPad.
There has been a lot of recent speculation that Hulu may be abandoning the Flash platform in favor of H.264 & HTML5 video that is becoming much more mainstream and is open-source, but today’s blog announcement from Product VP seems to point in the opposite direction:
“We continue to monitor developments on HTML5, but as of now it doesn’t yet meet all of our customers’ needs,” Wei said. “Our player doesn’t just simply stream video, it must also secure the content, handle reporting for our advertisers, render the video using a high performance codec to ensure premium visual quality, communicate back with the server to determine how long to buffer and what bitrate to stream, and dozens of other things that aren’t necessarily visible to the end user. Not all video sites have these needs, but for our business these are all important and often contractual requirements.”
Hulu also rolled out a number of less staggering news (in terms of some updated features).
I find it interesting that Hulu hasn’t found means to deliver their “goods” without using Flash. Look at ABC’s iPad app. It’s been a massive success for the network and continues to earn praise. I think that Hulu is missing a major marketing opportunity here. What do you think?
Article via CNet News. Read the full post here >>
Are you following MUM on Twitter?









